Skip to main content

Crane collapses, dropped loads and power-line contact

New York Crane Accident and Crane Collapse Attorneys

A crane injury claim depends on who was hurt. Workers may have Labor Law claims against owners and contractors; bystanders bring negligence claims. Neither is automatic.

We represent workers and passers-by on Long Island and across New York City.

(516) 227-2662
A crawler crane boom angled over a high-rise under construction at Hudson Yards in Manhattan.

Start here

Worker or bystander? Two different claims

Construction workers

  • Labor Law 240(1) requires owners and contractors to provide hoists, slings, blocks, ropes and other devices that give proper protection during covered work. The question is whether the injury came from a failure to protect against a risk arising from a physically significant elevation differential.
  • Where the statute applies and its violation is a proximate cause, the worker's own negligence is not a defense; where there is no violation and the worker's conduct is the sole proximate cause, there is no 240(1) liability (Blake, 2003).
  • Labor Law 241(6) requires reasonable and adequate protection where construction, excavation or demolition work is performed.
  • Owners of one- and two-family dwellings who do not direct or control the work are excepted. Workers' compensation generally covers the employer separately.

Pedestrians, neighbors and drivers

  • A bystander's claim is generally ordinary negligence: proof that the contractor, crane owner, operator or property owner failed to use reasonable care.
  • Evidence usually comes from the same lift records, plus site-safety and city inspection records.
  • If a public entity owned the project or property, a notice of claim is generally due within 90 days (General Municipal Law 50-e).
  • Most injury lawsuits must be filed within three years (CPLR 214); wrongful death generally within two years of death (EPTL 5-4.1).

The falling-object rule

Not every crane injury is automatic liability

“Falling object” liability is not limited to objects actively being hoisted or secured. Whether the object required securing for the work, and whether missing or inadequate protection caused the injury, matters.

Quattrocchi v F.J. Sciame Constr. Co., 11 NY3d 757 (2008). That is why the rigging and lift records below are gathered first.

Proof

The lift records that decide crane cases

Crane collapses and dropped loads usually trace back to planning, rigging or the decision to lift in the conditions that day. Federal rules cover operator certification and power-line safety.

A tower crane jib and hoist cables seen from below against the sky.
  1. 1

    Lift plan and load charts

    Whether the lift was within the crane's rated capacity for that radius and configuration.

  2. 2

    Rigging inspection records

    Slings, shackles and hooks that were worn, overloaded or wrongly chosen.

  3. 3

    Operator certification

    Federal rules require operators to be trained, certified or licensed, and evaluated.

  4. 4

    Power-line planning

    Whether anyone determined if the equipment could come within 20 feet of a line.

  5. 5

    Site-safety logs and weather

    Wind conditions, stop-work decisions, exclusion zones and who directed the lift.

Construction results

Results for injured workers

These are the firm's published construction and work accident results. None of the published descriptions identifies a crane accident; they are shown as examples of worksite injury cases only.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case depends on its own facts.

See the full verdicts and settlements archive
  • $8,000,000

    $8 Million Dollar Settlement — 2nd Department

    Plaintiff sustained a series of fractures and other injuries to the right shin, heel and foot, requiring nailing of the right tibia with two proximal and two distal locking bolts, ultimately resulting in below-the-knee amputation.

  • $750,000

    $750,000 Settlement

    Plaintiff injured when telephone pole struck him causing a traumatic brain injury and shoulder injury requiring surgery.

  • $1,157,000

    $1,157,000 Award

    Plaintiff injured at worksite sustaining traumatic tear of the left biceps tendon with tendon retraction which required surgery.

Related

Questions

Crane accident questions

Talk to a New York crane accident lawyer

Tell us where the crane was, what it was lifting and whether you were working or passing by. We will explain which claim fits, which records to demand and the deadline that applies. The consultation is free.

(516) 227-2662

What to bring

  • Site address and general contractor name
  • Your employer and union, if any
  • Photos or video of the crane and load
  • Medical records so far

Photo credits: Hudson Yards crane by Metropolitan Transportation Authority of the State of New York, CC BY 2.0, cropped and resized; Tower crane by ProjectManhattan, CC BY-SA 3.0, cropped and resized.